Result-way final and glides:
KGG - Lollipop: 71-67 -> 2-1
Pernambuco - Arkanoid 56.5 to 66.5 -> 0-2
Thursday, July 6, 2006
Does Spearment Tea Really Work 2010
Final results (one way) 05/07/2006 DISCIPLINARY MEASURES
Result-way final and glides:
KGG - Lollipop: 71-67 -> 2-1
Pernambuco - Arkanoid 56.5 to 66.5 -> 0-2
Result-way final and glides:
KGG - Lollipop: 71-67 -> 2-1
Pernambuco - Arkanoid 56.5 to 66.5 -> 0-2
Wednesday, July 5, 2006
Rocket Food Processor
=== ===
=== === DISCIPLINARY MEASURES
Pernambuco The team has deliberately and willfully violated the rules, despite numerous warnings via email, SMS, telephone and voice by the President.
As disciplinary measure, for the first leg of "glides" the Pernambuco will result in penalty of 12 points (equivalent to 6 points for each player on the field in more). The President reserves the right to impose a sanction greater than or equal to the return of glides, unless the Pernambuco not move back on his feet, choose Effect (Now only for the return leg) 5 opposing team in the semifinals (and not 8, as at present). 
=== === DISCIPLINARY MEASURES
Pernambuco The team has deliberately and willfully violated the rules, despite numerous warnings via email, SMS, telephone and voice by the President.
As disciplinary measure, for the first leg of "glides" the Pernambuco will result in penalty of 12 points (equivalent to 6 points for each player on the field in more). The President reserves the right to impose a sanction greater than or equal to the return of glides, unless the Pernambuco not move back on his feet, choose Effect (Now only for the return leg) 5 opposing team in the semifinals (and not 8, as at present).
Monday, July 3, 2006
Rio Ferdinand Hong Kong
semifinals
Arkanoid - KGG 66-84 -> 1-8
Lollipop - Pernambuco 84.5-60 -> 8-0
FINAL:
KGG - Lollipop
final for the 3rd and 4th place:
Arkanoid - Pernambuco 
Arkanoid - KGG 66-84 -> 1-8
Lollipop - Pernambuco 84.5-60 -> 8-0
FINAL:
KGG - Lollipop
final for the 3rd and 4th place:
Arkanoid - Pernambuco
Saturday, July 1, 2006
What Store Have Layaway
New rules for after-quarters?
back here the debate has developed concerning the taking of players beaten after the quarter-finals:
Lollipop
remember the four winners You can choose between the players of the opposing team
bar, 5 players at most and never again 'to
2 per department (as per government rules). If you'd like to change the regulation
race, adding the ability to take more
opponent 'players, I agree. But for a change
such scope and in time that it takes the unanimity ':
then invite everyone to comment on them.
Pernambuco
As far as I'm concerned (Pernambuco) I would take their opponents for all players needed to complete its pink (as long as there are).
KGG
MAh! Although it was an article of the regulation in all of us were aware at the time of the first and second auction, and nn said nothing, and despite that, watching the roses, was signed on the + lucky in that sense, my interest in and respect for the rules would have to remain at the max of 5, but since it is just a game where everyone should be fun, are agree on anything is decided.
Lollipop
remember that the "ratio" of the rule was not limited to "deform" too
the starting lineup. I do not know: we can expand to a maximum
of 11 (the goal 'of 22) and no more' portirere of 1, 4 defenders, 4 midfielders and 3 strikers
(the meta ') and' only a proposal.
KGG
's all a matter of pts of view, where nn means changing too deformed to 50%, the glass is half full or half empty !?!?! :)
Lollipop / 2
in my opinion,
is better not to distort it too much, however, should remain
the opportunity for each team to remain with the minimum number of players to have
A comprehensive, ie: 1 +2
goalkeepers
defenders
5 +2 5 +2 3 +2 ccampisti
strikers (if not mistaken, correct me opp)
otherwise some team might be
with holes can not be repaired, and / or
without any tactical choice that you can do .. .
That is, the maximum number would be what it takes
everyone to have a comprehensive set
and to deploy every possible training.
While the minimum that one can change, that rule would
old (5 max 2 per zone). Who has not
A comprehensive,
can take a full X + only where necessary. This
to keep the taste allenatoristico / tactical
addition to the managerial / strategic and prevent
a team will experience a loss due to forced
drainage / bleeding.
then depends on which aspect you want to accentuate ...
compliments and without prejudice to the merit of those who had foresight in his choice
+ rose + for long-lasting.
addition, KGG for its 7-0 and 6-0 for the Arkanoid ...
:) greetings to all the coaches.
Arkanoid
My position is this: if we do not want to anchor in the regulation as written
rule should be to want to be strict, I can also feel good
view of the completion of the game. Let's just say that
the criterion of 5 players and 2 to give a department award excessive
who guesses the teams that go forward and create too many holes to others. But honestly
your proposals fully cancel the premium and
such a thing does not seem right, not even thinking about the game
abstract and apart from the ongoing tournament. Both the criterion proposed by Lollo
half, and that of filling the holes so that the choice proposed
Lorenzo D. Valerio and I definitely sembreno
excessive. Both effectively allows us to deploy eleven holders
no one was part of the team the previous day!
I do not seem serious. In my opinion the most acceptable is to increase the maximum
to 7 players in total, no more than 3 for 3 defense and midfield, keeping
the limit of two for other departments (goalkeepers and attack).
would welcome the views of deleted that, if they can regardless of their
understandable envy, more than the rest of us could express an opinion
disinterested in the spirit of growth of the League Zibi Boniek
I refer, however, the decisions of Justice Fantasporto.
Greetings all and tributes to the presidency.
Internacional de Calle Pisin
I welcome the invitation of Nicholas to express an opinion "technical" and disinterested
the thorny problem of updates of the teams remained on course for
the conquest of the trophy.
After having carefully studied the different views already expressed,
I can not help but find very interesting and I found
also found wide acceptance in the literature, also sharing with you all
the sensitivity of the issue, sure to interpret the thinking of
eliminated, I tell you: I do not give
A GREAT RIVER !!!!!
Lollipop
since there is a clear consensus on a new regulatory solution,
the original regulations remain in force.
maximum of 5 players are "taken", max 2 per role.
Pernambuco
However, the rule of 5 seems too restrictive.
I groom the proposal to Nicola: "raise the ceilings
to 7 players in total, no more than 3 for the defense and midfield, keeping the limit of two for other departments (goalkeepers and attack)."
What do you think? We can still do it.
KGG
Carryover for the record, and especially forget the prox nn issue: the problem concerning the number of players on the opposing team that eliminated qlcn seemed insufficient to adequately coninuare the tournament.
propose in the future to introduce a new phase before the final double to win the players left out of the roses with a method of sealed envelopes. 
back here the debate has developed concerning the taking of players beaten after the quarter-finals:
Lollipop
remember the four winners You can choose between the players of the opposing team
bar, 5 players at most and never again 'to
2 per department (as per government rules). If you'd like to change the regulation
race, adding the ability to take more
opponent 'players, I agree. But for a change
such scope and in time that it takes the unanimity ':
then invite everyone to comment on them.
Pernambuco
As far as I'm concerned (Pernambuco) I would take their opponents for all players needed to complete its pink (as long as there are).
KGG
MAh! Although it was an article of the regulation in all of us were aware at the time of the first and second auction, and nn said nothing, and despite that, watching the roses, was signed on the + lucky in that sense, my interest in and respect for the rules would have to remain at the max of 5, but since it is just a game where everyone should be fun, are agree on anything is decided.
Lollipop
remember that the "ratio" of the rule was not limited to "deform" too
the starting lineup. I do not know: we can expand to a maximum
of 11 (the goal 'of 22) and no more' portirere of 1, 4 defenders, 4 midfielders and 3 strikers
(the meta ') and' only a proposal.
KGG
's all a matter of pts of view, where nn means changing too deformed to 50%, the glass is half full or half empty !?!?! :)
Lollipop / 2
in my opinion,
is better not to distort it too much, however, should remain
the opportunity for each team to remain with the minimum number of players to have
A comprehensive, ie: 1 +2
goalkeepers
defenders
5 +2 5 +2 3 +2 ccampisti
strikers (if not mistaken, correct me opp)
otherwise some team might be
with holes can not be repaired, and / or
without any tactical choice that you can do .. .
That is, the maximum number would be what it takes
everyone to have a comprehensive set
and to deploy every possible training.
While the minimum that one can change, that rule would
old (5 max 2 per zone). Who has not
A comprehensive,
can take a full X + only where necessary. This
to keep the taste allenatoristico / tactical
addition to the managerial / strategic and prevent
a team will experience a loss due to forced
drainage / bleeding.
then depends on which aspect you want to accentuate ...
compliments and without prejudice to the merit of those who had foresight in his choice
+ rose + for long-lasting.
addition, KGG for its 7-0 and 6-0 for the Arkanoid ...
:) greetings to all the coaches.
Arkanoid
My position is this: if we do not want to anchor in the regulation as written
rule should be to want to be strict, I can also feel good
view of the completion of the game. Let's just say that
the criterion of 5 players and 2 to give a department award excessive
who guesses the teams that go forward and create too many holes to others. But honestly
your proposals fully cancel the premium and
such a thing does not seem right, not even thinking about the game
abstract and apart from the ongoing tournament. Both the criterion proposed by Lollo
half, and that of filling the holes so that the choice proposed
Lorenzo D. Valerio and I definitely sembreno
excessive. Both effectively allows us to deploy eleven holders
no one was part of the team the previous day!
I do not seem serious. In my opinion the most acceptable is to increase the maximum
to 7 players in total, no more than 3 for 3 defense and midfield, keeping
the limit of two for other departments (goalkeepers and attack).
would welcome the views of deleted that, if they can regardless of their
understandable envy, more than the rest of us could express an opinion
disinterested in the spirit of growth of the League Zibi Boniek
I refer, however, the decisions of Justice Fantasporto.
Greetings all and tributes to the presidency.
Internacional de Calle Pisin
I welcome the invitation of Nicholas to express an opinion "technical" and disinterested
the thorny problem of updates of the teams remained on course for
the conquest of the trophy.
After having carefully studied the different views already expressed,
I can not help but find very interesting and I found
also found wide acceptance in the literature, also sharing with you all
the sensitivity of the issue, sure to interpret the thinking of
eliminated, I tell you: I do not give
A GREAT RIVER !!!!!
Lollipop
since there is a clear consensus on a new regulatory solution,
the original regulations remain in force.
maximum of 5 players are "taken", max 2 per role.
Pernambuco
However, the rule of 5 seems too restrictive.
I groom the proposal to Nicola: "raise the ceilings
to 7 players in total, no more than 3 for the defense and midfield, keeping the limit of two for other departments (goalkeepers and attack)."
What do you think? We can still do it.
KGG
Carryover for the record, and especially forget the prox nn issue: the problem concerning the number of players on the opposing team that eliminated qlcn seemed insufficient to adequately coninuare the tournament.
propose in the future to introduce a new phase before the final double to win the players left out of the roses with a method of sealed envelopes.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)